 Re: Legal Highs ( No.1 ) |
- 日時： 2013/03/31 19:53
- 名前： Kalpana <zbigniew.babik@uj.edu.pl>
- 参照： http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003421404402
- Frnlkay I think that's absolutely good stuff.
|
| Re: Legal Highs ( No.2 ) |
- 日時： 2013/04/03 18:51
- 名前： Lurraine <carolann@creativeanswers.com>
- 参照： http://www.dealsonedtabs.com/
- Agree and disagree with Steve. The historical graph shows temp (cause) driving CO2 levels (effect). However, the new variable is now humans are releasing CO2 (cause) sequestered in the remote past, in addition to any of the natural cycles responsible for the historical graph. I don’t think this graph can demonstrate quantitatively CO2 sensitivity (effect) at all. I think both warmists (notably Al Gore, non-scientist) and skeptics mis-use this graph to make their points.Serious question for Steve: Temps have been flat for about a decade, and you claim this proves climate sensitivity to CO2 is zero. But what if natural cycles would have caused temps to drop during the last decade, and that rising CO2 has prevented this drop? My bigger question for both alarmists and skeptics is, how large is CO2′s effect on climate compared to natural cycles. My other question is, will alarmists provide any objective data (insurance companies raising rates doesn’t count) that any type of weather catastrophy has been increasing in frequency or severity and that this is due to rising CO2? If not, then there is no environmental reason to curb CO2 emissions, other than encroachment on coastlines occurring at such a slow pace that mitigation can be done more cheaply than eliminating fossil fuel use (i.e. Bjorn Lomborg’s opinion).
|
| Re: Legal Highs ( No.3 ) |
- 日時： 2013/04/05 15:03
- 名前： Gwenelda <s.gruskofond@apache.com>
- 参照： http://www.comparecheapinsur.com/
- “He placed the instrument in a mixture of ice, water, and ammonium chloride, a salt. This is a type of frigorific mixture which automatically stabilizes its temperature at the freezing point, which he assigned at 32 degrees Fahrenheit.”Actually, the mixture of ice, water, and ammonium chloride always results in a temperature of zero degrees Fahrenheit, notated as 0. This is below the freezing point of water, and he arbitrarily marked the difference between water melting and boiling so that it would have a difference of 180, which made the difference between water and the mixture about 32 degrees. Celsius realized that this mixture was unnecessary and needlessly complicated so he did without it.
|
| Re: Legal Highs ( No.4 ) |
- 日時： 2013/04/10 14:54
- 名前： Rita <r.sneachis@web.tv>
- 参照： http://www.comparecheapinsur.com/
- No, CO2 is not all that high. To compare today’s concentration with ice cores is apples and oranges. Jaworowski, the leading authority, contends that there are 30ﾃδ｢ﾃつﾃつ�50% losses during the trauma and microfracturing of the coring method. If you back calculate 40% into the ice core data, you end up with values the same as or higher than now.Also, it beggars the imagination that people consistently ignore Ernst Beck’s collection of 80,000 direct CO2 bottle readings covering the last 180 years and the fact that many of those values are higher than now and form chronologically well defined rises and falls. Just because the IPCC cherry-picked a few low values, and declared their average to be the value for all of the 1800s, does not make it true or that we should all use such a dubious obviously biased and fabricated “datum.”There is also some chemistry involved that indicates that ice core CO2 values will be depleted and thus invalid as absolute readings.Ice cores can give us the times and trends of atmospheric CO2 rises and falls, but absolute values from ice cores? No!
|
| Re: Legal Highs ( No.5 ) |
- 日時： 2013/04/16 15:14
- 名前： Kelenna <chribran267380@gmail.com>
- 参照： http://www.findinsurrates.com/
- The one difference I will concede without debate is that Phoenix has had larger % growth than Vancouver recently so higher inventory is justified to some degree. Wouldn't a fast growing place have LESS inventory? As a comparison from retailing, the high volume stores carry less inventory as a percentage of sales. Even if it was a factor it could not possibly justify triple the poulation adjusted inventory.Second, growth or not, Phoenix now has over 12 months of inventory and growing fast. Twelve months during the proper selling season is unheard of. If Phoenix is growing, why aren't houses selling.Third, if Phoenix is outgrowing Vancouver, why are prices less than half of Vancouver? Why did our appreciation match theirs on the way up? I don't expect that beer, but you never know. If listings pick up by 50% (to and sales fall by 30% from current pace (roughly 60% sales/list), the ratio will hit about 25%, and we would add about 300 listings a day before expirations. Take off 100 or so for that reason, and we will add about a 4,000 a month (counting only business days). Divide by 2 to be conservative and to account for possible seasonal slowdown, and we add 2,000 a month. At that rate, we'd hit 3,000 by next February.It does look like we will shoot through 11K and get half way or more towards 12K this month. Contine that pace for a few months, and 20K is not that far away.But it is also possible that prices come down, which will pick up the sales pace and reduce inventory. That is the only thing that will prevent a huge inventory build up. Hardly a saving grace.
|
| Re: Legal Highs ( No.6 ) |
- 日時： 2013/04/16 15:14
- 名前： Retta <tas@companydirectors.com.au>
- 参照： http://www.findinsurrates.com/
- The one difference I will concede without debate is that Phoenix has had larger % growth than Vancouver recently so higher inventory is justified to some degree. Wouldn't a fast growing place have LESS inventory? As a comparison from retailing, the high volume stores carry less inventory as a percentage of sales. Even if it was a factor it could not possibly justify triple the poulation adjusted inventory.Second, growth or not, Phoenix now has over 12 months of inventory and growing fast. Twelve months during the proper selling season is unheard of. If Phoenix is growing, why aren't houses selling.Third, if Phoenix is outgrowing Vancouver, why are prices less than half of Vancouver? Why did our appreciation match theirs on the way up? I don't expect that beer, but you never know. If listings pick up by 50% (to and sales fall by 30% from current pace (roughly 60% sales/list), the ratio will hit about 25%, and we would add about 300 listings a day before expirations. Take off 100 or so for that reason, and we will add about a 4,000 a month (counting only business days). Divide by 2 to be conservative and to account for possible seasonal slowdown, and we add 2,000 a month. At that rate, we'd hit 3,000 by next February.It does look like we will shoot through 11K and get half way or more towards 12K this month. Contine that pace for a few months, and 20K is not that far away.But it is also possible that prices come down, which will pick up the sales pace and reduce inventory. That is the only thing that will prevent a huge inventory build up. Hardly a saving grace.
|
| Re: Legal Highs ( No.7 ) |
- 日時： 2013/04/17 14:25
- 名前： Chaas <2zhanglei@live.cn>
- 参照： http://www.findinsurrates.com/
- I used these guys to order my Flexifoil Hadlow ID kite called them on the Thursday at 3pm and after a 25 min phone call with some of the best kitesurf knowledge i have ever experienced in the UK i ordered a 8m and 12m great service kites then delivered on the Friday morning at 10am! so fast!But this is NOT the reason im writing this.. the reason is this.After 2 weeks the safety line snapped on my kite so i called Surface2Air Sports (www.s2as.com) they asked if i was local so they could fix it for me, I was from London but i wanted to make sure it was done correctly by these guys so i traveld down to see them.. Angelo was in the shop and fitted a new one in like 20 mins so so happy with Surface2Air
|
|
Legal Highs